![]() ![]() “Our position on the safety of our cosmetic talc remains unchanged. Louis jury delivered a $4.7 billion verdict against the company in 2018, saying the company was negligent and did not warn consumers about possible health risks from its baby powder. Lawsuits have been filed against the company alleging that asbestos in its talcum powder causes cancer. Some scientific studies have shown that women have an increased risk of ovarian cancer with talc use in the genital area, but others do not. (JNJ) argued such a label would be confusing, because it stood by its product. “This transition will help simplify our product offerings, deliver sustainable innovation, and meet the needs of our consumers, customers and evolving global trends.”Ī handful of talcum powder companies have put warning labels on their products, but Johnson & Johnson ![]() “We continuously evaluate and optimize our portfolio to best position the business for long-term growth,” the company said in a statement. But, in a statement Friday, the company said it would stop selling talc-based powder around the world next year as part of a “worldwide portfolio assessment.” Johnson & Johnson says it remains confident in the safety of the product. Its talc-based powder, which hasn’t been sold in the United States and Canada since 2020, is at the center of tens of thousands of lawsuits filed by women who have developed ovarian cancer after using regular talcum powder Johnson & Johnson is abandoning talc-based baby powder next year and instead will make it with cornstarch. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |